So say the watchdogs with 1000 Friends of Florida. So hugs and sippy cups for everyone.Īlso, if you’re one of the many citizens who contacted your legislator about that costly toll-road plan, give yourself a hug. But, just like with toddlers, politicians should be praised and encouraged when they clean up their own messes. Sure, it would’ve been better if they’d never greenlit this boondoggle in the first place. The House wisely voted unanimously to mostly undo this expensive exercise in sprawl. Rarely do I write those three words But let’s give praise where it’s due - to lawmakers who did a complete 180 and voted to repeal a plan to spend billions of dollars on unneeded toll roads. That means this school - which claimed that vaccines in one person could impact menstrual cycles in another - is eligible to get public money to educate children in this state. Here’s the slug: That school is a participant in Florida’s school voucher program. That part of the story is maybe worth a shrug. Twitter apparently quickly realized the conspiracy was the school’s and not the reporter’s, telling Florida Politics that it had suspended the journalist’s posting privileges “in error.” (Note that fixing the problem didn’t require a new law.)
#WAS THERE A STREAKER AT SUPER BOWL 2021 TV#
Speaking of Twitter, a TV reporter in South Florida had his Twitter account temporarily suspended this week after sharing a disturbing story about a private school in Miami discouraging its teachers from getting COVID vaccinations for fear that the teachers’ vaccinated bodies would somehow affect other people’s menstrual cycles.
“It makes me uncomfortable that we have to have this conversation.” “This is a bill you would see in countries that we don’t want to talk about …” he said. Petersburg warned his colleagues that their attempts at government-regulated speech were better suited for Cuba. But Republican legislators advanced the bill anyway. The Legislature’s own analysts cited both the First Amendment and the Constitution’s supremacy clause as legal hurdles. Government can’t require a private company to spread filth or falsehoods. This bill threatens to fine companies up to $250,000 a day for shutting off any politician’s account for any reason. But this bill goes right over a constitutional cliff, telling Twitter and Facebook that they have to let politicians to use the companies’ privately funded platforms - even if those politicians are using them to spread lies, share porn or make threats. Many of us want better from social-media companies. And if it becomes law, you’ll end up paying to defend this mess of a law. According to TMZ, Bovada investigated and refunded all bets because the stunt had been planned.Mark my words: The Twitter crackdown that legislators approved this week is unconstitutional. The man who made it on the field claimed to have profited via a prop bet made on Bovada. Millions of viewers watched on television as he bobbed and weaved through security, before eventually being tackled by a Hillsborough County sheriff’s deputy. The streaker wore yellow sneakers and a pink women’s swimsuit emblazoned with the name of an adult website. You may remember Kevin Harlan’s call when he made it onto the field. While they were distracted, a second man ran onto the field at Raymond James Stadium. The two men planned the stunt, with one of them jumping onto the field to distract security guards. And hopefully, you learned your lesson about all this. “I think you can tell by now, what might have been amusing back during the Super Bowl was not very amusing,” Hillsborough County Judge Jack Gutman told the two men, via the Times. As a result, both will receive one year of probation, during which they’ll be required to complete 100 hours of community service, pay a $500 fine and write an apology letter to the NFL. The two streakers who ran onto the field in the fourth quarter of Super Bowl LV between the Kansas City Chiefs and Tampa Bay Buccaneers have received their punishment.Īccording to the Tampa Bay Times, the two men pleaded no contest to trespassing charges.
0 kommentar(er)
